klemsim
10-09-2008, 10:12 AM
Hi teachers
A) Present perfect simple ( PPS ) is used also for events that began in the past and may still be in progress at the time of speaking. So this sentence could mean that you still are watching TV or that you’ve just finished watching it -->
‘I’ve watched TV for the last hour.’
But then the definition for present perfect continuous ( PPC ) tells that the difference between PPS and PPC is that unlike PPC, PPS is used for completed actions ( which goes against the definition of PPS ). I understand that with PPC there is greater possibility that the action is still not completed, but that doesn’t mean that ‘I’ve watched TV for the last hour’ means you’ve stopped watching the TV?
B) Same argument for the next two statements. Using PPC does give greater possibility that action is still happening at the moment of speaking and that the singing was more continuous ( PPS suggests that singing was more disparate activity, done now and then ), but even if PPS is used, there is still a chance that singing may be continuing at the time of speaking? -->
‘We’ve been singing for the last couple of the days.’
‘We’ve sung for the last couple of days.’
C) ‘He has knocked at the door several times.’ --> here PPS also suggests greater possibility of the event being finished at the time of speaking, but there is a small chance that activity is still in progress?
cheers
A) Present perfect simple ( PPS ) is used also for events that began in the past and may still be in progress at the time of speaking. So this sentence could mean that you still are watching TV or that you’ve just finished watching it -->
‘I’ve watched TV for the last hour.’
But then the definition for present perfect continuous ( PPC ) tells that the difference between PPS and PPC is that unlike PPC, PPS is used for completed actions ( which goes against the definition of PPS ). I understand that with PPC there is greater possibility that the action is still not completed, but that doesn’t mean that ‘I’ve watched TV for the last hour’ means you’ve stopped watching the TV?
B) Same argument for the next two statements. Using PPC does give greater possibility that action is still happening at the moment of speaking and that the singing was more continuous ( PPS suggests that singing was more disparate activity, done now and then ), but even if PPS is used, there is still a chance that singing may be continuing at the time of speaking? -->
‘We’ve been singing for the last couple of the days.’
‘We’ve sung for the last couple of days.’
C) ‘He has knocked at the door several times.’ --> here PPS also suggests greater possibility of the event being finished at the time of speaking, but there is a small chance that activity is still in progress?
cheers