Eddie88
07-23-2009, 04:54 AM
The head of a phrase classifies what type of phrase it is.
However, like prepositional phrases, which are one thing, but function as something else, other phrases can in fact be one thing and function as something else too.
DO you agree with this? I was told this was incorrect. But I have a sentence that contradicts that this statement above is false:
This is a sentence from a credible site:
The train from Montreal arrived four hours late.
The intransitive verb “arrived” takes no direct object, and the noun phrase “four hours late” acts as an adverb describing when the train arrived.
So, can a phrase function as something, even if it doesn't have this something in its phrase?
However, like prepositional phrases, which are one thing, but function as something else, other phrases can in fact be one thing and function as something else too.
DO you agree with this? I was told this was incorrect. But I have a sentence that contradicts that this statement above is false:
This is a sentence from a credible site:
The train from Montreal arrived four hours late.
The intransitive verb “arrived” takes no direct object, and the noun phrase “four hours late” acts as an adverb describing when the train arrived.
So, can a phrase function as something, even if it doesn't have this something in its phrase?