PDA

View Full Version : About verb agreement


music2starr
08-17-2006, 08:52 PM
Hi, whats the difference between these two sentences and is one of them wrong grammatically:

1. I did leave the house and go to the movie theatre.

2. I did leave the house and went to the movie theatre.


Thank you for your time.

Mister Micawber
08-18-2006, 12:41 AM
.
Only #1 has its compound verb correctly structured: did leave and (did) go.
.

music2starr
08-18-2006, 02:50 PM
Does this mean that sentence #2 is wrong? Is it not grammatically correct to have a compound verb and a simple verb used in the same sentence?

Mister Micawber
08-18-2006, 02:59 PM
.
Only #1 has its compound verb correctly structured: did leave and (did) go.The words in italics are the compound verb of the sentence.


Would you like to see a compound verb and a 'simple verb' in the same sentence? Here you go:

I ran to the store and bought a pistol, while my sister searched through the kitchen knives.

Ran and bought is the compound verb; searched is the 'simple' verb.
.

music2starr
08-18-2006, 07:26 PM
So why is sentence #2 wrong? Is it because the simple verb "went" doesn't have a subject of its own? Would this be correct:

2. I did leave the house and I went to the movie theatre.


But if the subject for the compound verb and the simple verb is the same (e.g. "I"), is it necessary to write the subject twice?

Mister Micawber
08-18-2006, 08:31 PM
.
I did leave the house, and I went to the movie theatre.

This is a different kind of sentence. Now you no longer have a simple sentence with a compound verb; you have a compound sentence with two independent clauses. It is fine, but my comma after house is recommended.
.

music2starr
08-19-2006, 02:49 PM
What about the original sentence #2? I'm still not sure if it is wrong grammatically as I've heard different opinions on it. What is the rule for constructing such sentences?

Mister Micawber
08-21-2006, 12:03 AM
Let's just say that I don't like it because it is ambiguous; we would expect the emphatic did to refer to both actions; that's why it seems wrong to me-- and I would correct #2 on a student's paper.

I do acknowledge that tense needn't be the same for both of the compound verbs: I was, am and always will be a vegetarian.

Nevertheless, the structure must be made clear to the reader/listener. The emphatic (affirmative) do seems, as an operator, to be less adaptable than the auxiliaries; it seems to need some help. For instance, I can punctuate your #2 to make it (to me) more clear that the compound verb consists of different forms, an emphatic past simple and a past simple:

I did leave the house-- and went to the movie theatre.

Now the emphasis is clearly on the leaving, and the destination is merely an afterthought to the outburst.

I hope this helps; I'm about out of ideas.
.

music2starr
08-21-2006, 11:37 PM
Thank you very much. I appreciate the time you've taken to explain things.